<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can Podcasting Help an Art Museum?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://garrickvanburen.com/archive/how-can-podcasting-help-an-art-museum/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://garrickvanburen.com/archive/how-can-podcasting-help-an-art-museum</link>
	<description>User Experience Strategy, Ruby and Rails Web App Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cuene</title>
		<link>http://garrickvanburen.com/archive/how-can-podcasting-help-an-art-museum/comment-page-1#comment-27393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cuene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garrickvanburen.com/archive/how-can-podcasting-help-an-art-museum#comment-27393</guid>
		<description>Cool! I was *just* thinking about this exact thing last week. I was out at the National Folk Art Museum (recommended) in New York and I was listening to two women talking about one of the pieces there. They were so excited, so passionate about what they were looking at that their commentary was more interesting than the &quot;official&quot; stuff. Now, they were also very smart and clearly they were academics, but it was the tone that I liked. Much less clinical than the typical soft hush story you get from the museum staff. I think it&#039;s a natural for podcasts. Sign me up if you need help with the project at the Walker. Or, at the Weisman. Cool stuff, Garrick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! I was *just* thinking about this exact thing last week. I was out at the National Folk Art Museum (recommended) in New York and I was listening to two women talking about one of the pieces there. They were so excited, so passionate about what they were looking at that their commentary was more interesting than the &#8220;official&#8221; stuff. Now, they were also very smart and clearly they were academics, but it was the tone that I liked. Much less clinical than the typical soft hush story you get from the museum staff. I think it&#8217;s a natural for podcasts. Sign me up if you need help with the project at the Walker. Or, at the Weisman. Cool stuff, Garrick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
