If Radio Changed Would Anyone Hear It?
6 Mar 2007 in Radio by GarrickThese days, after more than 5 minutes of broadcast radio, I need to turn it off or leave the room. It’s not just the commercials, or the decade-old play lists, or the insipid banter between “personalities” (NPR included), it’s also the lack of control (pause, skip, etc).
I was reminded yesterday of Flato - a coupon radio program (now with podcasts!). It’s an entertaining listen if you’re driving near Milwaukee. Back when we made that drive more frequently, there was a stickie note inside the dashboard with Flato’s frequency on it.
Radio needs to stop acting like it’s in competition - for ad dollars or community entertainment - with any of the media forms on Mark’s list. Radio needs to start being interesting. Hopefully before we all forget what broadcast radio is.
RELATED:
The payola investigation was successful:
Comments (5)
Ed Kohler added these pithy words on Mar 06 07 at 3:15 pmThere’s nothing easier to listen to than the radio. It’s in every car, so all you have to do is turn it on. The money (satellite) and time (syncing tunes & podcasts) people go through to avoid radio speaks volumes about the challenges radio faces.
Garrick Van Buren added these pithy words on Mar 06 07 at 4:01 pm@Ed, great point. Makes me think am/fm receivers should be optional equipment in cars.
Brett Astor added these pithy words on Mar 07 07 at 2:47 pmYou said “Radio needs to stop acting like it’s in competition … Radio needs to start being interesting.”
I can’t agree more wholeheartedly.
Radio needs to remember what business it is in: the business of providing compelling content that aggregates a homogenous group of people in a way that allows advertisers to communicate with those people efficiently enough so that advertising is profitable.
Garrick Van Buren added these pithy words on Mar 07 07 at 2:56 pm@Brett - If the only way to make money in broadcast radio is selling advertising:
- Why are broadcasters bothering with anything that’s not advertising?
- We’re in serious trouble.
alissa added these pithy words on Mar 07 07 at 5:59 pmthis is a good point:
Radio needs to remember what business it is in: the business of providing compelling content that aggregates a homogenous group of people in a way that allows advertisers to communicate with those people efficiently enough so that advertising is profitable.
however, it’s dangerous to accept it as a truth. just because i think the reason why radio got so messed up in the first place was because they were compelled to build something around the paradigm of selling advertising.
i think that following that model is just gonna lead you right back to square one. example…look at podshow.
maybe the new paradigm will be to cut out the advertising. and the middleman. after all, they were taking all the money anyway
Add a Comment
Related Entries
- So, You Want to Be a Public Radio Star?
- Another Reason I Can’t Support Minnesota Public Radio
- How Radio is Different than iPod
- The Next Standard in Public Radio
- Friday, April 13, 2007 1:33:51 PM
