Thursday, March 1, 2007 2:38:53 PM

1 Mar 2007 in General by Garrick

Digg v. Wikipedia - Which would you prefer to get thousands of referrers a day (exponentially increasing) from? I say the latter.

Comment | Trackback URL Short Link:

Comments (1 Comment)

Absolutely Wikipedia over Digg. They’re much more likely to read what you wrote, stick around for a while by subscribing via RSS.

Ed Kohler added these pithy words on Mar 01 07 at 11:03 pm

@dbrauer, re: culld.us - thanks. 1 hr ago
@kristiewells, 'customer support' (or similar) seems to work really well for @craignewmark :) 3 hrs ago
Things you already know: posting Obama signs in my lawn is waaay outside my comfort zone. 3 hrs ago
In my defense, Mpls is only 'at risk' for a recession. ;) @cullect/EconBlogs: http://culld.us/3817104 5 hrs ago
@bigboxcar - thanks. yes, I was also reminded of that bug last night. 7 hrs ago
http://culld.us made me smile this morning. How about you? 12 hrs ago
easy litmus test to determine if a solution to a complex problem is wrong: it's as one-dimensional as a superhero character. 3 days ago
just got a call from http://www.icrsurvey.com/ researching % of mobile-phone-only households by ZIP codes 3 days ago
it's nice to know that Nabbit.com's television counterpart - EvenHere.com - is also MN-based. 3 days ago
"if you can't get small, you'll never get big" @cullect/Garricks-Podcasts: http://culld.us/3743913 3 days ago
More updates...

RE: Rice Lake Cross Country Meet Back in HS XC, the Rice Lake race was one of a handful of races I always looked forward to. Aside from being a very competitive race, the course had an interesting features - back then, it started out around the Community College’s baseball diamond, as people fought for position and got into their pace
On the Trust-iness of the Media In last night’s talk with MN ISPI on wikis, blogs, etc - the issue of citing Wikipedia as a source came up. Like citing the 1911 version of Brittanica is the same as citing the current version. A strawman argument. One based on false assumptions. Assumptions that established organizations don’t have biases, aren’t infallible, and that knowledge
Sunday Morning Dot Connection “Airport security is the last line of defense, and not a very good one at that. Sure, it’ll catch the sloppy and the stupid — and that’s a good enough reason not to do away with it entirely — but it won’t catch a well-planned plot. We can’t keep weapons out of prisons 1; we
Saturday, February 24, 2007 4:30:02 PM I’m back at the Starbucks in Wausau, just uploaded the 96th First Crack Podcast and the first MNteractive Podcast Profile
RE: Who Benefits from the Federal Government? “From an efficiency point of view we should be happy that the rich don’t get too much “- Alex Tabarrok