Towards Seed Tuition, Not Seed Investment for Startups

Back in college, I asked a friend why – even though they didn’t like the professor – they didn’t drop their painting class. Their reply – it gave them a space and a time to focus on painting, and their disagreements with the professor helped them better articulate the goals of the work.

Excelerate Labs in Chicago is now taking applications for their ~12-week mentorship program for early stage startup founders. Like the legendary YCombinator program, Excelerate provides a small amount of capital (< $20k) in exchange for a percentage of the company. It seems to me, the goal for the startup founders in either the Excelerate or YCombinator program, is to use the introductions, connections, and 3 months of focussing on their project's value proposition to transform that <$20k investment into much more through pitches to larger investors. The professional introductions, mentorship, and focus these programs offer are hugely valuable for any professionals on-going success. Though - at the <$20k level - the success of the specific project is mostly irrelevant. In fact, I'm guessing these mentorship programs make their money back for the entire program in 1 successful company. My 4.5 years of formal education was financed through a combination of loans, credit cards, friends & family, and part time jobs. During that time, my primary job was to focus on developing salable skills that I loved. My tuition payments purchased the time & space to do so. I left college with <$20k in loan debt and a monthly reminder to get a return on my investment as quickly a possible. Unlike Excelerate or YCombinator, my loan providers didn't ask for a percentage of my future earnings (which could be possible through an income contingent loan). Instead they opted for a fixed monthly payment – arguably a decreasing percentage of my future earnings.

Late last year, I figured building a prototype for a custom web-based software takes 12 weeks. If you’ve estimated the duration for building a website, I’m sure this is a familiar timeframe. I’m also sure it’s no coincidence both the startup mentorship programs mentioned above use this timeframe.

It’s extremely difficult to do anything new & meaningful in less time.

And <$20k is a relatively easy amount to raise for the time and space to focus on building a revenue-generating project. What if, rather than providing startup founders with this money in exchange for a percentage of their project - mentorship programs charged the startup $5k/month and took no percentage. Seed tuition rather than seed investment. The mentorship programs could still offer the same connections, introductions, workshops, and focus - but the founders' incentives would be different as would the stakes for the mentorship program. The thing that feels closest to is a Masters of Fine Arts program where the students enter with a project idea and spend 2 years executing it. Maybe that's just my BFA talking.

My Proposal for an Open-Source Community News Platform

I wrote this up earlier this year and thought – maybe you know of a similar project that could get this idea off the drawing board….

This community news platform is designed to collect and disseminate information in the public interest for communities too small to be effectively served by a traditional daily news source and makes real-time community-based news reporting as familiar as picking up the phone.?

  • Messages are published and delivered via voice, email, web browsers, web feeds, and mobile applications.
  • These messages could communicate a real estate transaction, car accident, block party, garage sale, the current status of a major infrastructure project, show photos of recent storm damage, or document vandalism.
  • Each message published is automatically categorized by content and geographic location within the community.
  • Community members retrieve messages by location, content, or contributor.
  • Community members sign up to receive notification of a specific location’s messages in their preferred medium (voice, email, web browser, etc).

How is this different than something like Twitter, Facebook, or Yammer?

Like those services, it’s best when applied to a distinct community. Unlike those services – this system is open source (NEA) and a platform-agnostic (it receives input from and outputs to multiple mediums).

Published
Categorized as General

iPhone App Development Step 1: Hit a Brick Wall

This morning, I had an idea for a iPhone app. After drawing up a couple of sketches on paper – I dove into the internets to look for existing code, sample projects, or at least some tutorials that might get me started.

While I did find an extremely simple sample project that did something similar – the bulk of the research was:

Apple doesn’t allow that.

Just out of the gate and the answer is ‘No’.

So inspiring.

Combine this with all the stories of people struggling to get their application distributed by Apple – and there’s good reason for web apps were Apple’s first answer to iPhone development.

Published
Categorized as General

Garrick’s Web Technology History

Earlier this week – a message came through the web font mailing list referencing VRML. A painfully slow, barely usable, 3d modeling-for-the-web technology that I experimented with VRML during my time with Jeremy and da5d.

And I hadn’t heard of since.

Shortly after my adventures in VRML, CSS 2.0 supported custom web fonts as we know them today, and I did some early experiments with that technology.

These two memories made me wonder about the intervening years and the web technologies I’ve worked with since.

    Here’s what the journey looks like so far

  • 1996: HTML
  • 1997: VRML 2.0
  • 1998: Web Fonts in CSS2, more about designing with them, no tech development
  • 1999: —
  • 2000: Weblogs, more about the act of publishing with them, no tech development
  • 2001: WiFi & Tablet PCs, yes, these were some very hot Linux tablet PCs
  • 2002: —
  • 2003: RSS Feeds (more about reading them, no tech development)
  • 2004: Podcasting, First Crack Podcast, PodcastMN, etc
  • 2005: Weblogs – round 2, WordPress (WP-iCal, WP-GotLucky, WP-iPodCatter plugins)
  • 2006: RSS Feeds – round 2, Cullect
  • 2007: Twitter
  • 2008: URL Design & Shortened URLs
  • 2009: Web Fonts – round 2, Kernest
Published
Categorized as General

Expertise is Declared by Others, Not Yourself

One of the ongoing undercurrents of my thinking is the concept of acknowledged expertise.

A concrete example – we’re the worst people to write our own résumé. Talking with people we’ve worked with is better.

Having others describe us and what we do is far more accurate – if only because there are more of them.

What shows up in my Aadrvark.com profile today? The request to declare what I think my friends are experts in.

trusted_friends

Talent recruiters are about to get pwned.

Published
Categorized as General

The iPhone, iPad, and the End of QWERTY

“It is just a tragedy that we are taking QWERTY into a new era of devices” – Alec Longstreth in a Wall Street Journal article on this topic.

“The solution was to place commonly used letter-pairs (like ‘th’ or ‘st’) so that their typebars were not neighboring, avoiding jams. While it is often said that QWERTY was designed to “slow down” typists, this is incorrect – it was designed to prevent jams while typing at speed” – Wikipedia

For as long as I can remember, there have been attempts to displace QWERTY as the dominant Latin character keyboard layout – if only because the hardware problem QWERTY solved no longer exists.

Back college, I remember a fellow geek blacking out his keyboard and re-mapping it to Dvorak.

Efforts like the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard or Maltron are designed to increase typing efficiency (minimizing finger movement) by ordering characters based on frequent letter combinations within a specific language. In the case of the Neo layout – German is the target language.

The iPhones’ soft keyboard has quite a few layouts in it; QWERTY, numeric + punctuation, 9 key, URL-optimized, email address-optimized, not to mention all the international options.

While I only have the iPod Touch and it is missing some of the capabilities of the iPhone – I haven’t seen any mechanical typebars that may collide if I type too fast.

I have seen signs of a sophisticated spelling correction engine – which I imagine wouldn’t have to work so hard if the alphabet wasn’t all jumbled up on screen.

The larger format of the forthcoming Apple iPad, JooJoo, and HP Tablet, have the potential to be easier to write on – an write more on than on smaller phones. This with the increasing number of electronic devices with soft keyboards provide an huge opportunity to re-evaluate the usability of our keyboard layouts. Let’s find one that doesn’t apologize for the failings of a 125 year old technology.

Perhaps there’s an app for that?

Elsewhere:
THOMAS PAUL LUDDITE LAPTOP SLEEVE Luddite Laptop Sleeve – $50

Published
Categorized as General