The Head Lemur digs into Ning’s terms of service (similar to Flickr’s and YouTube’s, et. al) highlighting the problem: in exchange for free services “members” grant rights to their stuff to promote the “network”.
Sorry boys and girls, No Pony.
It is just another room filled with shit. They place ads around your stuff, and deliver eyeballs to advertisers in the electronic version of valpack coupons and junk mail.” – The Head Lemur
I don’t think it’s a fair trade either – it assumes that my stuff isn’t valuable in it’s own right unless it’s wrapped in AdSense. I wonder what one of these “social networks” would look like that places a higher value on their members’ stuff than on monetization.
Initial thoughts:
- Members pay a non-trivial amount for access
- Members can import, remove, and export all of their stuff easily
- Members can kill their account easily – say, by not paying
- The network considers members’ stuff private and won’t use it for self-promotion
From that list, I’m thinking BaseCamp or Joyent Connector are the closest things we’ve got.
ELSEWHERE:
Mike @ TechDirt says:
Yes, but, AdSense (and advertising in general) is an admission that the value is misunderstood.