I’d Rather I Could Read You Here

“the more time I spend w/ FriendFeed, the less I like it. I’d rather read y’all through my own blog.”

If services like Friendfeed, Twitter, etc, have an innovation, it’s in present reading and publishing in the save view. This single view – often described as ‘presence’ or ‘social-ness’ – makes it easy to write a comment or publish a new idea quickly.

The 2…3…4? blogs I maintain is where I feel the most comfortable exploring and archiving ideas1. Yet the one (apparently killer) feature the popular weblog tools lack is this combined view. I’m thinking of the ability to easily initiate a reply on one weblog/service that can be read in its entirety on another weblog/service – without a click.

Separate places distracts and dilutes.

“By keeping me posting small thoughts all day long, I have less urgency to capture those thoughts in longer, more fleshed out blog posts. It eats away at my time, the continual partial attention it requires saps cycles from my brain’s CPU and in the end what do I have?” – Dave Slusher

Now, imagine loading up feeds into a WordPress install and reading them the same way you read things within FriendFeed or Twitter or WhatHaveYou2.0. The writing process would remain the same, and when a post is published – it’s sent to all the other sites/services that are subscribed to the feed.

Weblogs today aren’t far off. The difference is immediacy and a read/write combined presentation. There’s nothing requiring a weblog post to; be larger or smaller than some arbitrary number of characters, have comments, categorization, or any number of other things that separate it from ‘microblogging’ tools.

Perhaps you feel more comfortable publishing through Twitter or YouTube or Utterz than a weblog proper. This difference should be as meaningless as our respective carriers when we’re chatting on the phone.

1. This post originally started as a comment on FriendFeed, but the lack of paragraphing and a few other annoyances sent me here.

Are Some RSS Formats More Reliable/Faster than Others?

via Twitter, I was asked the above question.

It’s a good question, cutting to the core of my ambivalence over the religious wars between RSS, Atom, etc.

The flavor of XML a feed is published in shouldn’t matter.

Neither to the publisher nor the receiver.

Any parser able to handle multiple flavors should be able to parse all flavors equally fast. Some parsing engines are built for one flavor of XML or another – rather than abstracted to parse XML in general. Then again, it’s trivial to spit out one XML format as another, so, maybe format is a conversation between the user agent and the server.

Eh. (Get a smarter parser, jeeez.)

From my studying of both RSS and Atom, comparing them is like comparing the UIs of Windows and Macintosh. They do feel different. One puts window buttons over here, one puts them over there. One is this color, one is that color. One prefers the Control key, the other prefers the Command key. Some people prefer this one, others prefer that one. One says ‘potahtoe’. One, ‘potaytoe’.

From my I understanding, Atom was developed due to perceived deficiencies and ambiguity in the RSS 2.0 spec. Perhaps RSS 2.0 is guilty of being open to interpretation. I don’t know. I’ve found it to have logical places for everything I want to publish. Same for Atom.

Last I checked, Cullect was parsing somewhere north of 8100 feeds. Cullect doesn’t and shouldn’t care if a feed is Atom or RSS or RDF or filled with crazy namespaces. Cullect has 2 jobs when it comes to feeds; parse XML tags in a smart way, publish out useful feeds in whatever flavor the user agent requests.

The biggest issue I’ve found in parsing thousands of XML feeds is badly published XML. Feeds using the tags in bizarre ways. Feeds just not conforming to any spec. Feeds published in a way that just makes parsing hard.

Both RSS and Atom publishers are equally guilty. My Wacky-Feeds-That-Won’t-Parse list of contains just as many RSS feeds as Atom feeds.

A year ago, I wrote up my thoughts on publishing RSS 2.0 for easy publishing.

Snippet: Copy MySQL Databases Over SSH

I needed to copy a database and the idea of backing it up just to re-import1 seemed like double the work. Here’s a snippet to pipe a mysqldump into a remote database. Keep an eye on the user names and passwords – you’ll need 3 sets; one for the database your copying, one to get into your remote server, and one for the remote, target database.

mysqldump -v -uUSER -pPASSWORD --opt --compress DATABASE_NAME | ssh REMOTE_SERVER_USER@REMOTE_HOSTNAME mysql -uREMOTE-MYSQL-USER -pREMOTE_MYSQL_PASSWORD REMOTE_DATABASE_NAME

1. Backing up is a good thing. Why aren’t you doing it? Here’s a script for that.
mysqldump -h HOSTNAME DATABASE_NAME | gzip -9 > BACKUP_DIR/DATABASE_NAME.sql.gz

Summer Camp Hookie

On this beautiful Saturday, I missed PublicRadioCamp. Unfortunate for many reasons, including – many of my favorite people in town were there. Hell, some of my favorite people in town organized it.

Instead, I had one of the best days ever with my family.

Our Day

  1. Sleep until after 7am
  2. Pick up a few things from the Minneapolis Farmers’ Market
  3. Grab a Coffee
  4. Take a Leisurely Stroll through the Sculpture Garden
  5. Home in time for lunch
  6. “Nap” – I finished my book club book during nap time, while the kids didn’t sleep soundly in their beds 😉
  7. A walk to Audobon Park for a dip, some swings, and an afternoon coffee.
  8. An amazing Pea-Mint-Leek soup dinner
  9. Mixing up bread dough with the boy before bedtime.
  10. A quiet Netflix and wine with Jen after bedtime.

After all that, I’m catching up what I missed with Bob Collins Off to Camp post. Good stuff.

Ruby on Rails Snippet for Changing Relative Paths to Absolute

If you have a bunch of text containing relative path hyperlinks, and you’d like to change to them to absolute paths, you might find this snippet helpful.


content = "some text with a <a href='/path/to/relative_link/'>relative link</a>"
link = "http://somedomain.com/"
content.gsub(/=('|")//, '=1*/').gsub(/*//, link.match(/(http|https)://[w.]+//)[0])

The asterisk ‘*’ is a hackey placeholder for the actual link swapped in with the second gsub. If you know of a way to pass in the link without needing the placeholder, awesome – paste it in the comments. Thanks.

Quoted in APM’s ‘The Pork Wars on YouTube’

As part of APM’s Public Insight Journalism program, I was interviewed as about the use of sites like YouTube for political issues (vs. campaigns) – specifically in the context of the recent tennis match between animal rights groups vs farm industry groups.

Here’s the bit of my interview they used on-air and online.

“Garrick Van Buren is a social media consultant. He says YouTube is useful only as a place to upload videos. It isn’t likely the best destination site for marketers, because videos are lost easily in the heap.”

“‘Figure out where the people that you are trying to reach are. Are they at Facebook? Then create a Facebook app. Find those people that are most likely to spread your message,'” Van Buren said.”

Jon Gordon’s Twin Cities Coffee WiFi Google Map Started

Jon Gordon‘s going to be in the Twin Cities for a while and he thought it’d be fun to review the local selection of independent coffee + wifi shops.

As part of that effort, I’ve started a Google Map for listing and pin-pointing these places. There’s also a handful of invites floating around to for those that want to help.

Want one?


View Larger Map

Update 07 July 2008
I just cracked open a PBWiki for this project: http://twincities-coffee-wifi.pbwiki.com/

Something New In the Air

Two of my favorite people are starting new podcast projects in the next week.

  1. Kris Smith formerly of Croncast will be launching Life in the Can next Friday, still with Betsy on the other mic.
  2. Dave Slusher is launching the Reality Break podcast a couple days later.

Both projects are aiming to be more sponsorship-friendly than their preceding productions and I think that’s interesting. To date, sponsored showed haven’t kept my attention, but that had more to do with me being uninterested, not an aversion to sponsors. I trust Dave and Kris will be doing some interesting things to make it a win for everyone.

Kris, Betsy, Dave, congrats on the new production.

They’re both already in Cullect.com/33.